A letter from a Physician to the ACOG (and my response!)
Quote:
Not all physicians agree with the AMA’s position, however. Dr. Andrew
Kotaska, noted Canadian researcher and Clinical Director of Obstetrics and
Gynecology at Stanton Territorial Hospital, issued the following response:
I would invite ACOG to join the rest of us in the 21st century.
Modern ethics does not equivocate: maternal autonomy takes precedence over
medical recommendations based on beneficience, whether such recommendations
are founded on sound scienctific evidence or the pre-historic musings of
dinosaurs. In the modern age, the locus of control has, appropriately,
shifted to the patient/client in all areas of medicine, it seems, except
obstetrics. We do not force patients to have life-saving operations, to
receive blood transfusions, or to undergo chemotherapy against their will,
even to avoid potential risks a hundred fold higher than any associated with
home birth. In obstetrics, however, we routinely coerce women into
intervention against their will by not “offering” VBAC, vaginal breech
birth, or homebirth. Informed choice is the gold standard in decision
making, and it trumps even the largest, cleanest, RCT.
Science supports homebirth as a reasonably safe option. Even if it didn’t,
it still would be a woman’s choice. ACOG and the AMA are, by nature,
conservative organizations; and they are entitled to their opinion about the
safety of birth at home. As scientific evidence supporting its safety
mounts, however, (to which BC’s prospective data is a compelling addition)
they will be forced to accede or get left behind. The concerning part of
this proposed AMA resolution is the “model legislation.”
If ACOG and the AMA are passive-aggressivel y trying to coerce women into
having hospital births by trying to legally prevent the option of homebirth,
then their actions are a frontal assault on women’s autonomy and
patient-centered care. Hopefully the public and lawmakers realize the
primacy of informed choice enough to justify Deborah Simone’s words: “We
don’t need to be angry or even react to these overtly hostile actions from
the medical community. We just need to keep doing what we do best; the proof
is always in the pudding.”
It is sad to see the obstetrical community still trying to earn itself a
wooden club as well as the wooden spoon; if the resolution passes, it is sad
to see the politico-medical community helping them.
Andrew Kotaska
Yellowknife
==================================
My Reponse:
Great letter…the only thing, is that the medical community’s lack of boundaries does NOT limit itself to the area of Birth. Big Pharma IS starting to force health decisions on people-particularly the parents of ill children-the PARENTS are being forced to give treatments to their children which go against their instincts/beliefs or personal research. They are being fed fear and threats, even having their children removed temporarily to be treated-not allowing the parents to see the child and support them through such a difficult process! There is no humanity-no compassion-no intelligent thought left in the upper echelons of the Medical Realm. It sickens me.
Remember the teenage boy with leukemia, whose mother refused chemo, and instead helped her son to COMPLETELY heal himself through a variety of natural healing modalities, verified by medical tests? Not in remission-HEAL HIMSELF. The courts still forced this boy, who now did NOT have leukemia to undergo Chemo-to suffer through the effects of such a treatment-when he was perfectly healthy. Why did they do this you ask? Because they wanted the money for the treatments? Maybe-but I suspect that it was better for their “PR” than anything else. You see, if they “let” one woman and her son do it successfully without their help-in fact better than those who ARE “helped”, then well…chaos could ensue! People may actually have the audacity to start thinking for themselves! To take back their rights to their bodies, and begin refusing chemical poisons as a way to “manage” or “cure”.
The rights of autonomous and self-directed medical choice are not only being denied in the birthing sector. It’s happening everywhere-some more subvertly than others, (ie not giving ALL the information, Bill C-51 in Canada which WILL affect the US policy on natural supplements and Codex Alimentarius), and more obviously with situations of hospitals refusing VBACs and forcing people to take treatments like the above example. The problem is, that when we allow one family to fight this alone and they lose, Big Pharma claims that territory. One by one, one family at a time. This is why we need to be more vocal-more “in your face” with the truth about Birth and other natural health options.
If we do nothing besides talk amongst ourselves…we are without hope.
Filed under: Codex Alimentarius, Bill C-51, Health Rights, Natural Health, alternative lifestyle, natural birth, natural parenting, Childbirth preparation, birth on June 29th, 2008 | No Comments »




